MEEF
Add MEEF to my Favorites

Main Page

About Us

Advertise

B2B

Bulletin

Engineering

Contact us

CyberShow

Events

Gallery

Home

Interlude

Jobs

Marketplace

Projects Archive

Recycling

Sitemap

Site Stats

Submit Release

Visitors in
Free Firefox


Middle East Economic & Engineering Forum

Construction Risk Management - Commercial General Liability Insurance for
Construction Contractors - Credit Insurance -
previous page

 

Search this site  


Effective Risk Management

Some projects appear to have a passive and ad hoc approach to the management of risk, without the benefits of either tracking the root causes of identified risks or making proactive decisions and actions to mitigate the risks. In a passive and ad hoc approach, risks may be identified but they are largely ignored in the planning and execution process until undesired events occur, at which time solutions are sought.

This approach often includes an assumption that additional resources will be made available to solve the problems that arise, precludes the prevention of some undesirable events, and increases the costs of addressing others. An inexperienced project team, inadequate front-end risk management planning, and a tradition of budget increases may be the primary motivation for passive risk management and deterrents to implementing proactive risk management.

It is the owner’s responsibility to ensure that project risks are rigorously and aggressively managed and reviewed by senior managers in each of the project phases. The previously discussed risk identification, analysis, and mitigation planning are important, but they are not sufficient. Active risk management includes the assignment of mitigation responsibilities to appropriate project participants and the oversight of follow-through regarding every risk factor.

This chapter reviews some tools and methods that can form the basis for the development of risk management excellence by owners.

RISK MANAGEMENT PLAN

The risk management plan ties together all the components of risk management—i.e., risk identification, analysis, and mitigation—into a functional whole.

The plan is an integral part of the project plan that informs all members of the project team and their supervisors of the risks to the project, how they will be managed, and who will manage them throughout the life of the project. It should be part of the initial project approval package, and an updated plan should be part of all subsequent project planning and performance reviews. Risk management plans are dynamic documents that are used to guide day-to-day decisions by the project team.

The sample table of contents shown in Box 7-1 provides an outline of the issues that should be covered in a risk management plan. The level of detail in the plan may be adjusted for small, relatively simple projects, but the basics of risk identification, analysis, and mitigation need to be covered. The risk register (described later in this chapter) is often the core of risk management plans for smaller projects.

WATERFALL DIAGRAMS

A risk mitigation effort is a project activity and thus should have assigned resources, assigned personnel, and an estimated cost and duration. Similarly, a risk mitigation activity should be included in the project network and tracked, reported, and managed along with other project activities. The assigned objective of a risk mitigation activity is to reduce the impact or likelihood of a specific risk factor. If a risk is high, it is unacceptable to the project, its mitigation is critical to project success, and it must therefore be closely monitored by project management.

A risk mitigation activity may thus be on the project’s critical path, making the activity especially important. Even if actual execution of a risk mitigation activity is assigned to a contractor, the owner’s project director should follow its progress, because failure to mitigate the risk may require other efforts to avoid project failure. Waterfall diagrams are used to incorporate risk mitigation activities in the standard project management procedures. They differ in this way from a risk register, which tracks and monitors risks separately from other project activities. Figure 7-1 shows a hypothetical waterfall diagram, extracted from the context of a project network diagram, with the project risks qualitatively tracked over time and divided into three color-coded zones of severity. The red zone corresponds to high or unacceptable risks; the yellow zone corresponds to moderate but unacceptable risks; and the green zone corresponds to low, acceptable risks.
 

Advertisement
 
 

 

Advertise | Articles | Bulletin | Contacts | CyberShow  | Events | Jobs | Home | Projects  | Sitemap | Stats

 

Copyright © 2006 Middle East Economic Engineering Forum | RAK Free Zone | UAE | Tel/Fax: +971 50 374 0617 All rights reserved.

 

This site is best viewed using Internet Explorer 4 or higher

Website Created: Mar. 7th. 06  - Add MEEF to my Favorites